7.4
THE FUTURE IN PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
7.4.1
NEW FACILITY DESIGN
Viral-based vaccine manufacturing under GMP conditions requires an additional bio-
safety level when compared to the classic mAbs industry. Biosafety level 2 (BSL2) is
often the standard for many viral-based manufacturing. BSL 1 (generally used of mAbs)
focuses on the protection of the product from the operators and the environment,
whereas BSL 2 focuses on containment, protecting the operators and the environment
from the product. Increased biosafety level classification adds manufacturing and facility
complexity and costs. In this respect, having closed processes are essential to mitigate
any possible contamination of the product and also to facilitate the risk assessment
evaluation which has to be performed for any new product introduction into the facility.
Besides the BSL consideration, viral-based vaccine manufacturing and in general
viral vector therapeutics needs facilities that are both modular and flexible to ac-
commodate different virus types and as well as different scales.
Modular facility designs and modular construction are being used in biologics
manufacturing, with a key benefit being faster time from inception to start-up. The
BioPhorum Group hosted an industry collaboration that proposed a standardized,
modular design approach to help advance facility design in the industry [75]. While
the initial project looked at a monoclonal antibody (mAb) facility, it plans to extend
the concept to cell and gene therapy production which is similar in needs to viral-
based vaccine manufacturing [76].
With the modular facility framework, the ballroom concept is a key pillar. The
ballroom approach features a large open operational space where closed processing
equipment can be co-located in the same space. The industry has accepted that the
functionally closed upstream production trains for therapeutic proteins, but not viral
operations, can be deployed using an open ballroom approach. For the operation of
VBVs in a ballroom concept, fully closed systems are required (not only functionally
closed), together with a very thorough risk assessment. This is often challenging to
achieve in many viral-based vaccine processes [77]. To date, processes involving host
cell infection, viral production, purification, and product formulation should be spatially
segregated in a separate room to contain vector particles within a specified zone in the
facility. Regarding heat, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, these
spaces should utilize dedicated air handling units or single-pass airflow to minimize
contamination risks. For multiproduct facilities, processing of multiple VBVs should be
performed either on a temporally segregated campaign basis (with sanitization in be-
tween) or in parallel but completely segregated viral production spaces for each product
campaign produced.
7.4.2
PROCESS INTENSIFICATION
Given the increasing worldwide demand for VBVs, which includes attenuated and
inactivated viral vaccines, as well as viral vector vaccines, faster development times
are required to progress VBVs more rapidly into clinical development and then to
market. This has meant VBV manufacturing is changing and is being driven by the
need for increased speed and greater flexibility. The requirement for greater
192
Bioprocessing of Viral Vaccines